by Guest Columnist
Christopher Dorman
Partner
Phillips Lytle LLP
New York, NY
So often we hear about the world getting smaller. Sounds trite, but it’s true. New technologies make communication accessible and easy, transportation, likewise, more available and faster. Familiarity among diverse cultures is growing. Whether a cause or a consequence of these phenomena, cross border transactions are more common than ever.
Wherever you are doing business you’ll need to choose law to govern your business deals.
The legal systems of New York and England are common choices for good reasons. They are both commercially sophisticated and efficient in terms of execution of contractual rights and remedies. But, while both systems share much in common, and are two of the most prevalent choices of law in international business deals, they are different systems.
When is one more appropriate than the other for transactions? The answer may depend on your goals.
For example, New York allows a lender to take security and perfect on receivables without taking full dominion. But in England certain case law indicates taking dominion fundamental to perfection. In the realm of bankruptcy, however, the time it typically takes for a lender to realize its remedies is swift compared to the U.S. where bankruptcy (besides being governed by Federal law) is often a drawn out process.
So what’s one to do when involved in international transactions and the parties are considering having the contracts governed by New York or English law? The answer will depend on many factors, such as: (i) are goods being imported or exported, (ii) if lending where’s the location of debtor and collateral, (iii) are other laws in issue (i.e. EU employment laws), and (iv) do the parties wish to be governed by arbitration and, if so, which arbitration regime?
If you play in this arena and it’s more likely than ever that you do, while not intended as legal advice, here’s a few tips:
1. Always consult local counsel. (In New York, a lawyer. In England, a solicitor – no, they are not those people who wear the wigs.) ;
2. Ask about the appropriateness of arbitration (will a decision stick?), what are tax consequences, employment rights, export regulations and how does the Convention on the International Sale of Goods, which unless opted out of, automatically alters certain provisions of the Uniform Commercial Code for contracting States of which England is not:
3. If you’re a creditor, drill down on how collateral is treated in the jurisdiction of your customer – e.g., taking security in various types of collateral, perfection rules and foreclosure rights.
Please send posts or tweets to us if you have any comments or questions for Christopher Dorman.


